|
HISTOPLASMOSIS
IN WILD ANIMALS
|
| Animals can present light infections or course to a severe disease ending in death. The known records on isolation, infection, and disease caused by H. capsulatum refer to mammals |
|
Wild animals, just as other living beings, are subject to changes in their natural environment determined by evolution processes and by alteration or damages to their natural ecosystems by anthropogenic actions1. In particular, cavern-like environments are used by middle-sized (carnivorous, edentates and marsupials) and small-sized (bats and mice) animals as shelters or in search for food. Frequently, these environments are part of their activity area including their territory and, in some cases, these can be modified by human activities. These environments, as well as other sites where microclimatic conditions favorable for the development of the H. capsulatum pathogen are established, represent an infection risk for mammals in general, including the human being1. Emmons2, in 1958, evidenced for the first time the relationship between bats' habitat and the presence of the pathogen. In Mexico, Aguirre-Pequeño3, in 1959, and Gonzalez-Ochoa4, in 1963, corroborated this relationship. ISOLATES, INFECTION, AND DISEASE REGISTERS Although there are reports on the isolation of the fungus from bird droppings, the disease itself or natural infection in these animals has not been described in the corresponding literature. In India, Chandel and Kher5, described an unusual case of histoplasmosis in camels (Camelus dromedarius). Table 1 depicts the disease registers reported for wild-terrestrial mammals made by different authors and classified according to Wilson and Reeder6. The subclinical infection in wild mammals has been detected in a captive population 7, by using a skin test with the fungal histoplasmin antigen in order to determine past or present infection, finding a global response of positive intradermoreaction of 44.79%, distributed among: primates -. Cebidae Fam., 15.15% and Callitricidae Fam. 6.25%; carnivorous -. Procyonidae Fam., 86.49% and Felidae Fam.,50%, demonstrating with this study that there is a high rate of infection caused by the fungus in captive animals7. Recently, at the Africam Safari, located in the state of Puebla, MX, Arely et al. described the natural infection by H. capsulatum in a mara or Patagonian hare (Dolichotis patagonum). In Guadalajara, Jalisco, MX, Espinosa et al. referred infection in a captive leopard.
Kunz8, in 1988, compiled data on bats natural infection published around the world, where the fungus has been isolated. Studies performed by Fernandez-Andreu9 and by Taylor et al.10-11 include new isolates that represent first records for the American continent and Mexico. During the last 10 years a large number of H. capsulatum isolates have been obtained from infected bats in Mexico.
The relevance of natural infection with the fungus in bats is a very interesting issue, considering different aspects such as environmental education of the population poorly informed on the real value of bats as ecosystem moderators (Figure 1), as active participants of biodiversity processes, as hosts to the fungus, besides other interesting aspects, including archaeological ones (Figure 2). Vincent et al.12, in 1986, through DNA fragments analysis by restriction enzymes (RFLP), determined the genetic polymorphism of two fungal strains isolated from infected animals, an opossum and a cat12, which they grouped molecularly under class 2, which encompasses almost all the H. capsulatum strains isolated in the USA. This suggests that both humans and wild or domestic animals are exposed to the same type of strains from different infection sources in nature. During the last years, research groups from the Laboratories of Fungi Immunology and Molecular Mycology of the Department of Microbiology and Parasitology of the Medicine School at UNAM, in association with mastozoologists from the Zoology Laboratory of the Iztacala Campus from UNAM have studied and grouped fungal isolates from bats naturally infected and captured in the Mexican territory. This research has allowed to identify a molecular-geographic pattern of the fungus associated both to wild hosts and to humans13.
REFERENCES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||